I was struck by the last article on Ilvo Diamonds Repubblica.it
I report the steps that I think are simply illuminating and meaningful for discussion of the issue of democracy:
The "issue of democracy", in my opinion, and evokes the first identity. Why the Democratic Party has not yet decided - or clear - who he is and what he wants. The values \u200b\u200band projects-divided. Up to this point has highlighted those "divided." And the divisions seem inspired by personal reasons rather than strategic ... that. [...] Hence the difficulty of proposing, so far, as credible alternatives. Why can not make a clear policy proposal.
Why does a party oligarchy. Impervious to social demands, and - in the words of Pareto - the "circulation of elites" expressed by territory.
only that many voters struggling to identify with a party that does not recognize. Which mobilizes the base but the visit intermittently. Where the choice of candidates and the leader is entrusted with the primary. But the leader is pre-set by the national leadership. That also affects the local appointments. The Democratic Party, therefore, remains an incomplete party. Do not have a recognizable and recognized mission. And why can not establish itself as a real alternative. But no alternative - the Government and Government - is possible without the Democratic Party. Managed to clarify itself, could explain it to others. First, to his constituents. To believers and uncertain, and exiled and disappointed. But it must do so today. Tomorrow is too late.
In a few lines the issue of democracy and pitted, and analyzed the proposal in no uncertain terms, that I can not fully share what Diamond says.
Here the complete article
The Secretary of the Club
Fabio Lamon
0 comments:
Post a Comment